PowerLabs Rail Gun Current Research Progress!

Page description:

This page contains all the tests performed with the Rail Gun once it was built; here you will find results, my interpretation of those results, and modifications resulting from knowledge acquired through these tests. After a number of tests the barrel cracked, so the most current Rail Gun page on this site is now the RailGun 2.0 page, where the construction effort of a new, improved Rail Gun is currently being documented.
Hover your mouse over the photos for a description, or click on them for a larger version.
If you are looking for Rail Gun construction info go to the Rail Gun Construction Page.

Day-By-Day Project advances and current project status:

June 05 2004: Rail Gun Disassembled:

I finally got around to disassembling the gun and examining/photographing its internals. A lot can be learned from how this design worked, and how it failed, and this knowledge will be applied on a new, superior design, which is being designed and built at the moment.
The original PowerLabs Rail Gun was designed in two sections: a polycarbonate injector with Teflon Rails, and a Rail Gun section with copper rails and a Garolite G-9 fiberglass composite. The injector was made from polycarbonate due to its very high tensile strength (10000PSI) and resistance to shock loads. With the 1/2″ thick polycarbonate sheets holding the Teflon rails under a maximum of 500PSI injection pressure, it was not believed that this design could fail, thus using polycarbonate represented a cost saving over the stronger, but much more expensive G-9, which was used for the rail enclosure where higher forces would be encountered. In fact, this design was strong enough that it could never have failed under the calculated load produced by even the highest possible energies available at the capacitor bank. Failure occurred not due to Lorenz forces, but rather due to the intense pressure produced when plasma armatures were repeatedly fired at high energy levels; this higher pressure was expected, and incorporated into the over design of the gun, but what was not expected was that the plasma shock actually traveled back into the injector, and produced enough pressure there to shatter the material in 5 different places. The breakage of the gun occurred at the mating point between the polycarbonate and the G-9 materials, indicating that this connection was clearly the weakest point of the gun. The use of a weaker material, a two-stage design, and countersunk holes in the injector bolt holes proved insufficiently strong to withstand repeated shots at over 10 000Joules. The force of the discharges was enough that, aside from shattering the Polycarbonate, it bent the steel bolts that held the injector together, de-laminated the G-9 side supports for the rails, and deformed the Teflon rail insulators. There is also ample evidence of plasma blow by past the insulators. This is clearly a source of inefficiency as the blow by bleeds pressure which would otherwise go towards accelerating the projectile.
All of these design weaknesses have been resolved for the Rail Gun 2.0, which will be a vastly stronger accelerator, capable of firing reliably and repeatedly at energy levels of at least twice those seen in this first design. The rail enclosure will now be a single piece made of Garolite G-11 (a stronger material than G-9) with no counter sunk holes or mating points. The rail connector exit points in the gun will also be optimized to minimize stress concentrations. Another advantage of this re-design is that rail/injector alignment and rail positioning accuracy will be much greater. It will also be gas tight, which will provide greater efficiencies when firing plasma armatures.

The Rails:

The rails held up surprisingly well; after 12 shots without any kind of servicing they were completely covered in black carbon soot. This carbon came from the adhesive in the aluminum tape used in the plasma armatures burning up. It was useful in evidencing the plasma blow by in the region of initial rail/armature contact.

After cleaning the rails show evidence of cratering and pitting; classic effects of electrical arc erosion. Significant amounts of copper have been removed, and a copper/aluminum alloy formed in the bottom of the craters. The amount of erosion was lower than expected given the number of shots fired and their energy level (over 150 000Joules were run through these rails). The insulators were also virtually undamaged by all the discharge, evidencing that Teflon is a very suitable insulator for this particular application.

Interestingly, a second arc crater formed 5.6 inches from the breech. I believe this was due to the armature not making contact with the rails until that point during a lower voltage shot. That, together with the extensive arc damage, evidence to the need for closer machining tolerances and a tighter rail/armature fit, both planned for the next Rail Gun.

April 7th: Discovery Channel show aired!

Lurking in the electromagnetic lab at Michigan Technical University is a new kind of super-hero, an undergraduate obsessed with the power of electromagnetism: PlasmaBoy. 

March 21: The Rail Gun is on Discovery Channel!
 A crew from The Discovery Channel came to my University to film some of my research on electromagnetic accelerators. For 10 hours I explained and demonstrated how magnetic fields can be used to accelerate objects, and how electricity can be stored and converted into linear motion. The presentations included linear magnetic attraction, Thompson’s coil, the Coil Gun, and, of course, the Rail Gun.
This should air on “The Daily Planet” some time next month. I’ll post the date as soon as I have the details.
The associate producer for the show insisted that plasma armature shots were more impressive (I agree). 6 shots were performed with plasma armatures, at increasingly higher powers. The gun performed flawlessly, producing some excellent video footage. The last shot, at 14500Joules, was loud enough to make my ears ring. It also produced enough back pressure to crack the polycarbonate inductor on 8 different places! The gun will be repaired soon. As I re-design the barrel to ensure that this can not re-occur I expect to also make some small upgrades to the gun. The tensile strength of polycarbonate is 10 000PSI. With only 400PSI on the injector, my design margin of safety was more than adequate. However it appears as though the instantaneous localized shock pressures formed when the aluminum backing on the Teflon projectile turns into a plasma at over 80 000amperes of current must be running in the millions of PSI; sufficient to blow by the rail insulators and shatter the area around where the plasma formed. This is very surprising; I expected a lot of pressure, but not quite this much. It is also very exciting; if the plasma armature is producing enough force to blow the gun apart, a new design, completely holding that pressure without deflection should be able to harness it and convert it into incredible muzzle velocities. Stay tuned, the best is yet to come!

March 17th: I upgraded the Rail Gun charger with a new transformer and a half wave voltage doubler. Just like the previous one, this assembly came from a microwave oven. The voltage doubler allows me to charge up the capacitor bank to a higher voltage, and to do it faster. This is done in preparation for the Discovery Channel presentation I will be giving this Sunday.
My first attempt at fast charging caused the current limiting charge resistor to go up in smoke (that’s a 10 inch ceramic resistor!). I was forced to bypass it. With the current limiting resistor bypassed the capacitor bank can be charged to 3000V in under a minute! During charge/discharge tests the charge resistors overheated and melted their stand. When the resistors fell on top of the capacitor bank they caused an explosion powerful enough to shear some bolts and lift the top of the box up. This was very unpleasant. Nothing was damaged and now that the gun is clean and tested I feel ready for the presentation tomorrow.

March 16th: I milled a Phenolic block and polycarbonate top to perfectly fit around the machined rail / inductor connector on the Rail Gun. This block serves as an insulator for the high voltage connector. With the inductor now in a permanent mounting position it was time to attempt the first test firings. These firings are significant in several ways: first of all the gun now utilizes a much more accurate voltage monitoring system (+- 50V), which will allow me to make much better calculations relating to efficiency when I finally get the chronograph to work. Also, the injector is now operating with Nitrogen. This reduces rail erosion and arcing, and also, despite the lower pressure (the regulator on the tank will only go up to 400PSI), should provide a slightly higher muzzle velocity due to Nitrogen’s 30% lower molecular weight.
Finally the addition of the inductor lengthens the duration of the electrical pulse, lowering current (and thus resistive losses and rail erosion). Two tests were performed, both with 2300V on the capacitor bank, amounting to 8300Joules stored energy (less then 50% of what the gun is capable off; I see no point in burning up the rails with 20KJ before I actually get the gun working efficiently). The first test utilized an aluminum foil backed Teflon projectile, and the second one a solid aluminum projectile. Test videos are available by clicking the respective test pictures below:

The plasma armature shot was of course much louder. The Teflon projectile destroyed itself on impact unfortunately (those things are a pain to machine). Both shots produced significant muzzle flash and trailing sparks, indicating still significant erosion. The aluminum projectile had metal smeared on it from beginning to end; a big contrast from the initial non inductor shots which only eroded the very tip of the projectile; this means that pulse length is now indeed several times longer with the inductor. I plan on taking an oscilloscope to the gun and measuring exactly how much longer the pulse length is. The original (non inductor) test projectiles are show below next to the inductor-fired projectile for comparison purposes:

March 8th: The Rail Gun inductor is now installed! Now all I have to do is mill a phenolic block to house the custom made copper block connector so as to insulate it for safety purposes and the gun will be fired in its new configuration! Stay tuned, big changes are about to happen… Once this inductor has been used to measure pulse length increase I should be able to plug the values into my Microsim PSpice circuit simulation and design an inductor that will bring the pulse length into the 100s of mS, which will keep the rails under power for several inches of projectile travel and, if my theory is correct, allow the gun to fire at much higher efficiencies and velocities. I will also begin some serious work on getting the Chronograph shielded from the muzzle flash so I can produce efficiency comparison charts from real muzzle velocity readings.

February 27th: In order to obtain valuable data from Rail Gun test firings, it is very important to know the amount of voltage in the capacitor bank. The original Rail Gun design employed a Simpson 10kV probe in the power supply, which, divided the voltage by 20; as well as being inaccurate, and requiring a calculator for reading the values, this probe was also behind the charge current limiting resistor (400Ohms) and so it read a voltage that was always greater than the real capacitor bank voltage. Finally, if the bank was shorted out, the probe would read zero, when in fact there could be some charge in the bank. All these problems have been taken care off by the addition of an internally assembled Fluke 80K6 6-kV probe. The probe provides high accuracy real time /1000 voltage readings for my multimeter and represents exact capacitor bank voltage across the bank’s end terminals, regardless of what resistance is at the rails. Of course, this means that the voltage dividing resistor has the full 20000J available to it, and as such everything is located inside the bullet proof capacitor bank box.

February 20th: I finally got a Nitrogen tank for my lab. The tank is charged to 3000PSI and has a 0-400PSI gas regulator on it. Using Nitrogen Gas for the Rail Gun projectile injector will increase muzzle velocity (due to the fact that N2 has a lower molecular weight) and also protect the rails from oxidation by purging oxygen.

I finished machining the copper connectors for the Rail Gun inductor. The connectors are solid copper, one bolts on to the capacitor bank inside the case directly to the end bus bar (thus avoiding exposed HV-carrying parts) and the second one to the rails through a machined solid copper billet.

New Sponsor!: Below is a photograph of 12 neodymium N45 grade supermagnets each 2×2″ base with a 2×1″ top and one inch high. These are the strongest magnets I have ever seen; in one word, they are Dangerous. Strong enough to crush fingers, drive metal objects through soft wood, or explode on impact when two are released together. I will be employing their fantastic field strength as external field augmentation for higher efficiencies in Rail Gun 2.0. They have been sponsored by Engineered Concepts; the cheapest and best magnet supplier on the ‘net!

February 18th: A film crew from Discovery Channel is coming here this Saturday to film the Rail Gun for The Daily Planet and I decided to upgrade the gun with pulse shaping inductors for the show. I’m somewhat worried that I’m gambling with too many unknowns so close to a major presentation but at the same time I am now thoroughly convinced that the gun does need extra inductance; the pulse length is simply too fast at 63uS; my projectile scorch marks on the rails are under one inch in length and I can’t see any real high efficiency acceleration coming from that short a travel under power; the smallest research RailGun I’ve seen to date was one meter long (granted, it also fired at 200kJ stored) and I’m assuming it used all 100cm of it to accelerate the projectile to 2km/s. I’ll lose a lot of magnetic force by lowering the current but right now given current results I am convinced it is worth it. The inductor mounts are almost complete.
Without an LCR meter, an inductor meter or an oscilloscope I have no idea what the inductance I am adding to the gun is, but I suspect it is not nearly enough. Nonetheless, it should start improving results; at 20kJ, even an improvement of 0.1% in efficiency can make the projectile move several hundred feet per second faster… That’s what I love about working with big energies 🙂 Can’t wait to finish this project and get the 46kJ capacitor bank out… Can you say “hypervelocity”?!

February 11th: More plasma shots, and new discoveries!

I fired off two more plasma armature shots yesterday; possibly my last two before the rail gun disassembly for the pulse lengthening inductor and improvements to the capacitor charge voltage monitoring system.
These shots aimed at testing 3 new ideas/developments and brought about some new and unexpected discoveries. Below you can see the set up used for these two shots:

The Rail Gun was set up in the back of the laboratory firing across it into a trash can full of various materials, from foam to rubber, cloth and wood. Charging and firing was done remotely from a test stand.

The first test involved a specially shaped projectile: the triangular tip aims to improve aerodynamics and allow the projectile to move faster. The back is shaped inwards, with the intent of causing the propellant pressure to open it up and thus seal it better against the sides of the barrel. I believe a better seal may prove beneficial in obtaining higher velocities from the plasma armature, and I know from observing the first plasma propelled projectile that the plasma armature is overtaking the projectile (blowby) and causing efficiency losses as it continues to accelerate on its own.
On this shot’s after shot picture (next to projectile picture) it can be seen that the projectile hit the foam perfectly on its side and cut a neat impression of it through the foam. The blackening of the sides is from rubbing against the sides of the rails; the lack of burn marks indicates that blowby has been reduced. Plasma is still leaking past the top and bottom of the projectile. This can be reduced by machining a closer fitting projectile but at some point friction may become too great to and negate any increase in efficiency from the reduction of blowby. This shot was not as loud as the first one, and it produced more sparks, indicating that the aluminum was not completely turned into a plasma. It was however very fast, penetrating deep into the backstop.

The second test was an attempt at increasing projectile mass; a sharpened tungsten spear was placed inside a tapered Teflon projectile. Two layers of aluminum foil were crumpled behind it in order to study the effect of having a greater mass of aluminum to produce a denser plasma armature. This shot yielded very surprising results:
The massive muzzle flash and shower of sparks indicates that a lot of energy was expended in melting and vaporizing the aluminum, and some of it did not completely turn into a plasma. The shot was *very* loud; the loudest I have ever heard from this gun. It was also very fast, penetrating deep into the projectile stop and only stopping when it cut into one inch of vibration dampening rubber mat. The tungsten spear was blown out of the hole and into the target, whereupon it disappeared. Despite the blowby evidenced by scorch marks on the sides of the projectile, and the pressure leakage from the hole formed when the spear exited still inside the barrel, this was the fastest shot to date, very likely to have been supersonic. I believe this was due to the larger mass of aluminum behind the projectile producing a greater plasma density and propellant pressure from the vaporization and superheating of the aluminum. This is counter intuitive as I would expect the energy lost in vaporizing the aluminum to decrease acceleration efficiency, but apparently there is a mass of aluminum vs efficiency curve that peaks somewhere above a single strip behind the projectile. This is very interesting! I also suspect the ideal mass of aluminum used for a plasma armature may increase with increased stored energies.
I look forward to firing the gun with pulse shaping inductors very soon, and attaining unprecedented efficiencies and very high velocities. I believe the gun has surpassed mach 1, and mach 2 may be within reach at a full 20 000Joules stored energy.
On the meantime I apologize for the lack of chronograph readings (which, of course, are the only truly meaningful of accessing real efficiencies) and invite you to enjoy the following video, showing the test firing of a conventional (metal) armature projectile and all my 3 plasma armature shots to date, for comparison purposes. The last shot is the one using the extra aluminum foil backing, notice how much louder it sounds. Click on slideshow for video.

February 6th: Rail Gun Plasma shot!

Click on the picture to download video. The video is approximately 50 seconds long, 10MB. It shows me bypassing the safety fuse on my power supply, charging the Rail Gun air tank to 450PSI, and loading an aluminum backed Teflon slug into the barrel. The first shot is aimed at an apple. It fails in that the aluminum backing does not form an electrical connection with the barrel and thus the projectile “only” reaches +- 600fps from air alone before blasting the apple to pieces against the backstop. The second shot is performed at a much lower 100PSI and with a starting velocity of around 70m/s the projectile is now further accelerated by a plasma armature, leaving the barrel with the sound of a rifle shot and proceeding to perforate the backstop and embed itself into a catalogue. The muzzle blast is a lot cleaner, with no sparks and nothing but a concentrated 5 – 6 feet long purple plasma “flame” leaving the barrel. The gun is also (not too surprisingly considering the extremely high temperatures and resulting pressures of a multi megawatt plasma) much louder with the plasma armature. Still no chrono readings but I am now thoroughly convinced that a pulse shaping inductor is in order. Details for the shot: 100PSI, 2.2KV.
More video to follow. Comments are always welcome.

This is the projectile after being fired with an aluminum armature. Notice the massive amounts of plasma blow by which scorched it and left it with black marks on all sides. This plasma blow by is an efficiency loss that must be corrected.

January 30th: Pictures of my new laboratory:

I think I’ve figured out how to mount the inductor. I will use an internal connection and a lathe made (by myself of course) massive copper plug/jack assembly. Machining begins tomorrow.

January 22nd: I am back from my co-op as a Systems Engineer at Vermont Yankee Nuclear Power station, and there have been many changes to the Rail Gun project. First of all the Advanced Space Propulsion laboratory where I was currently working received a new vacuum chamber, which now takes up all the available space. My research has thus been moved to the Sub Basement of the Mechanical Engineering building at Michigan Technological University, at the Internal Combustion Engine and Dynamics Research Laboratory. It is a much larger lab, where I have my own desk, table and storage space. On January 20th the gun was moved to its new location and set up, and on January 21st it was fired for filmed presentation for TV6, a local news station. It performed well. I’ll upload the video when I get it.
Work must now progress quicker, as the gun will soon be featured on Discovery Channel.
As such I have decided to tackle the first problem and largest inefficiency cause in the gun: the pulse length is extremely short (63uS) and causes all of the energy to be dissipated in a very small segment of the rails: some times as little as 1 inch! With such a fast, there are two problems: Power amounts to the energy in the capacitor divided by the discharge time. With the current pulse length of 63uS a full 20kJ charge will dump nearly 330MW, or 90 thousand amperes on the rails. Resistive losses are a product of the square of the current, so even the relatively small rail and (particularly) arc contact resistance of the gun there is a LOT of energy being lost. This loss manifests itself as low efficiency and a dramatic erosion to the rails. Also, with such a short pulse, the magnetic field formed behind the projectile is non optimal. By lengthening the pulse, acceleration will occur for a longer period of time, rail damage will be spread out over a larger area, and resistive losses will decrease. The accelerating force may be lower, but I theorize that this is the way to go for higher efficiencies.
So how to increase the pulse length?

 With an inductor of course. This picture shows my first two prototypes: A toroidal air-cored (non-saturable) inductor with 23 turns of insulated AWG 4 oxygen free copper wire around a 2.35 diameter PVC pipe loop. The loop outer diameter is 8″ on average. Anyone who has taken apart a power supply will recognize this as a super size version of a very common component in DC power supplies 🙂 The second one utilizes the exact same amount of wire and turns but is a linear arrangement. The inductor will be added in series with the rails and slow down the pulse. A detailed analysis of this will come soon. A second inductor is also being built so series vs. parallel arrangements can be tried. I suspect eventually the gun will be using a lot more inductance than this. But its a start… Figuring out how to connect it to the gun will be a challenge of its own…

June 17th: Today was my safety review day; had my advisor and a pulsed power professor from the EE department look over all my schematics and gun wiring and make some suggestions before I begin firing the gun in the University. The required modifications are as follows:
1- Replace steel Rail Gun mounting bolts for Nylon ones.
2- Place safety cover on discharge switch.
3- Ground Rail Gun barrel bolts or replace them for fiberglass reinforced nylon ones.
4- Make projectile backstop (must be able to stop a rifle round).
Looks like I’ll be busy… The gun might also be moved to another laboratory on the 5th floor of the Mechanical Engineering building… No more powered testing for another couple of weeks. On my side, my current plans for the gun are to build a muzzle flash suppressor so I can use it with a light break chronograph, to test fire it with a plasma armature and to obtain oscilloscope traces of the gun firing with metal and plasma armatures. With the data from those shots I will begin work on an inductor and then possibly a power switch.

June 16th: After a series of tests with the rail gun injector I obtained a more accurate plot of the velocity imparted to the projectile at 6 feet from the muzzle versus the pressure present on the injector air tanks at the time of firing. It is very interesting to note that the curve follows what appears to be a logarithmic plot; I.E. doubling the pressure in the air tank will quadruple the amount of energy stored in it and make a lot more noise during firing but will not at the same time double the injection velocity; it appears as though after a certain point increasing the pressure substantially will not result in very substantial velocity increase. Currently the injector is firing at 150m/s, with a variation of +- 2m/s between shots. This injector is also able to fire a Teflon projectile at 195m/s (634.5fps, 696km/h, 432.6mph). It is important to note that when power is applied to the projectile it is only halfway through the rails and therefore not traveling as fast as the ultimate injection velocity, but these will be the values used for calculating the gun efficiency. I plan on making a chart of injector pressure vs. kinetic energy to see if that is more linear. Current kinetic energy for the gun is 67.5Joules prior to injection. This is quite insignificant when compared to the 20 000 that is being applied electrically to the projectile during firing.

June 13th: Thyrathon switched Rail Gun? Maybe not: this is what L-3 electron devices had to say about my idea:

“Sam,

Our thyratron engineer looked at your requirements and suggested a spark gap. It was beyond the capability of the thyratrons that we currently manufacture.

Buzz Miklos”

A spark gap, huh? Considering how loud the one on my Tesla Coil was while switching .5joules, I think I will pass on a 360 megawatt spark. Looks like I will just have to build my own thyrathon… I practiced some oxyacetylene metal cutting today. Next week I will work some more on the muzzle flash suppressor and on some gun documentation for the safety review on Tuesday.

June 12th: Finished wiring the power supply, installed the air tank, hydrostatically tested it to 600PSI. It appears as though the extra pressure is not all that beneficial to muzzle velocity: the gun right now is clocking around 500fps with 500PSI in the tank.
Today was the big day! After testing all systems the Rail Gun capacitor bank was charged to 1700V, which yields an energy stored of just under 9kJ and the gun was fired into a very heavy catalogue. I suspected that the muzzle flash would “blind” the very sensitive light break chronograph and attempted using three sheets of corrugated cardboard as a makeshift muzzle flash suppressor. It did not work well enough that the chronograph gave me a reading (it just said “error”, as it does when a picture is taken inside the room) but the shot was nonetheless spectacular. It was about as loud as firing a gun inside the room (from now on earmuffs a must!), the air filled with an acrid ozone smell, computer monitors flickered and the projectile had enough energy to punch into 700 pages of the 1500+ page catalogue. With air alone at 500PSI the projectile barely sticks to the paper. It is not possible yet to determine if the projectile is going supersonic or not but the gun is definitely imparting a substantial amount of kinetic energy to the projectile!
Below are some pictures of the setup and the damage caused by the shot. The video is available for download at the bottom.

A quick note about Rail Guns: The muzzle flash that occurs when the gun is fired is unavoidable and a direct byproduct of their operating method (sliding electrical contact). The flash and sparks are seen every time the gun is fired and although they represent a power loss, they are an unavoidable one. I find it somewhat sad that certain jealous individuals need to repeat over and over again on a message board that my rail gun shoots sparks as though that was some kind of defect.

And at last, what you were all looking for: The Rail Gun >9KJ Test Fire Video!; air at 500PSI and >9000J on the capacitor bank. BTW for comparison purposes the injector is imparting approximately 80J of kinetic energy into the projectile right now. I will need a better camera than my Sony digital camera to capture more frames of the muzzle flash but this gives a good idea of what the firing looked like live. Look forward to more powered testing as soon as I build a more effective way to shield the chronograph!

June 11th: Finished wiring and building the temporary high voltage power supply. It is pretty crude, made from wood an without too much engineering behind it but as the name implies it, all I want it for are some preliminary tests. I got around the safety concern of using wood by having all the connections inside the power supply being made from high voltage rated wire. The PSU is grounded and a 1:20 high voltage probe is being used to monitor charge voltage. I charged up the Rail Gun today to 2000Volts (about 7KJ) and discharged it through its discharge resistors. Everything is working well but I might in the future reduce the size of the discharge resistors and the charge resistor so as to make everything charge/discharge faster.

I also got around to painting the new injector and the temporary power supply box. Glossy black enamel of course; my favorite color for weaponry 🙂

June 10th: Threaded the 1/2″ brass valve connection in place, glued it with 6 hour metal epoxy and filled the CNC machined 1/2″ polycarbonate valve connection piece with two part epoxy for added strength, finished gluing everything. Tomorrow the tank will be painted and the old one will be removed. Hydrostatic testing will hopefully take place on Thursday, with test firing possibly occurring the same day.
While I waited for the glue to dry I worked some more on the Power Labs High Efficiency Coil Gun prototype.

June 9th: Glued the PVC elbows, end caps, pipe and tee together and screwed the brass elbows and brass tee together with teflon tape. I drilled and tapped a hole on one of the end caps for the brass filling system to go into and filled the cap up to 1/4 inch depth (6mm) with metal epoxy so as to strengthen the plastic pipe that had been weakened by the threading. I also CNC milled a precision flat end cap for the middle of the tee where I will thread the valve attachment. Tomorrow hopefully I will paint the completed air tank and it will be ready for hydrostatic testing on Wednesday. I will probably hydrostatically test it all the way to 650 or even 700PSI due to the extremely dangerous nature of the high pressures that this tank will hold.

June 7th: The parts for the new 500PSI Rail Gun injector arrived today. The new ball valve and pressure gage attachment will allow me to charge the gun up with air at a very accurate pressure and close off the tank, which would make it possible to take the charged injector to a remote place where testing could be performed without a source of air. The 1 1/4 SCH 80 PVC looks very strong, and I would most definitely feel safer around it at 500PSI than I did around the 1  1/2 SCH 40PVC at 300. Lets just hope the 300 PSI solenoid valve feels the same way I do.

June 05: I spent most of my day practicing some MIG welding for the Junkyard Wars show I’m going to be in on 37 days, but I still found some time to test the temporary Rail Gun charger and build more of the box that will house it. I also got a high voltage test probe from one of the electricians here, so as far as parts go I’m all set! I charged the gun up to 200V today and everything works beautifully.

June 04: Non metals centre still closed (they are re-varnishing the tables there and so no dust can go into the room). I cut a polycarbonate square for the rectifier bridge, helped a friend clean his motorcycle engine and built an entire coil gun so as to have something to do for the afternoon. The new coil gun will have its own dedicated page some time soon; stay tuned.
I made a chart relating the rail gun injector muzzle velocity with the air pressure present on the air tank at the moment it was fired. This data is preliminary as the pressure measurements were read off the regulator and since it has a 4000PSI scale it is difficult to read accurately at such low values. We can see that the relationship is somewhat linear, but that after 200PSI further increases in pressure do not seem to be causing equal increases in velocity (or perhaps the projectile became damaged after the 3rd test).
A more accurate chart will be created once the new injector is ready.

June 03: The non metals centre was closed so I could not work on the charging power supply box. I gave the projectile injection issue some more thought and decided that the current injection velocity would require a very significant amount of inductance to be placed on the circuit, which will produce a lot of undesirable oscillations and thus make it very difficult for a solid state switch to be implemented into the circuit in the near future. In order to lower the induction requirement I quickly designed a new, intermediate pressure injector by designing an air tank made from 1 1/4 inch SCH 80 PVC as opposed to the current 1 1/2 SCH 40 PVC. This changes the working pressure of the air tank from 330PSI to 520PSI, although it will involve over loading the solenoid valve a certain amount. The gun injector should be operating at 500PSI and having accurate pressure monitoring built into it starting next week. Below is a list of the materials that will be used for the conversion. Doubling the air pressure inside a tank quadruples the energy stored, therefore the new injector should be firing with perhaps 60% higher velocity, maybe more when Nitrogen is used. I am still working on the final design, for the second Rail Gun to be built which will employ 3000PSI valves and should achieve supersonic velocities.

Quantity	Description	Unit Price	Ext. Price	Ships
1 EA	Dual Scale Steel-Case Gauge 2% Mid-Accuracy 2″ Dial, 1/4″ NPT Bottom, 0-600 Psi	$7.24 EA	$7.24	today
2 EA	Brass Threaded Precision Pipe Fitting 1/4″ Pipe Size, 90 Degree Male Elbow, 4100 Psi	$7.09 EA	$14.18	today
1 EA	Brass Threaded Precision Pipe Fitting 1/4″ Pipe Size, Tee, 3000 Psi	$6.41 EA	$6.41	today
1 EA	Extruded Brass Threaded Pipe Fitting 1/2″ Pipe Size, Fully Threaded Nipple, 1-1/8″ Length	$1.52 EA	$1.52	today
1 EA	Dark Gray PVC Schedule 80 Unthreaded Pipe 1-1/4″ Pipe Size X 5′ Length	$4.49 EA	$4.49	today
2 EA	PVC Sch 80 Unthreaded Pipe Fitting-Dark Gray 1-1/4″ Pipe, 90 Deg Elbow	$2.60 EA	$5.20	today
1 EA	PVC Sch 80 Unthreaded Pipe Fitting-Dark Gray 1-1/4″ X 1″ X 1-1/4″ Pipe, Reducing Tee	$5.16 EA	$5.16	today
2 EA	PVC Sch 80 Unthreaded Pipe Fitting-Dark Gray 1-1/4″ Pipe, Round Cap	$3.78 EA	$7.56	today
1 EA	Plastic-Pipe Cement PVC Heavy Duty, 8 Ounce Dauber-Top Can, Clear	$2.93 EA	$2.93	today
1 EA	Chrome-Plated Brass Ball Valve W/Lever Handle 1/4″ NPT Female Connections	$4.03 EA	$4.03	today
1 EA	Extruded Brass Hex Nipple 1/2″ Pipe Size, 1-13/16″ Length	$2.03 EA	$2.03	today
1 EA	Extruded Brass Threaded Pipe Fitting 1/2″ Pipe Size, Fully Threaded Nipple, 1-1/8″ Length	$1.52 EA	$1.52	today
1 EA	Extruded Brass Threaded Pipe Fitting 1/4″ Pipe Size, Fully Threaded Nipple, 7/8″ Length	$0.49 EA	$0.49	today
Total:				$62.76

June 02: 7 hours of work today. The day started off bad when, after building a full wave bridge rectifier for the high voltage charging supply my volt meter caught fire during a low voltage measurement (cheap radio shack piece of …). I did get a current measurement though, but it was off scale for the meter (>500mA). After dinner my allied electronic order for HV connectors had arrived, as had my shooting chronograph, and so I decided to go back to the Advanced Space Propulsion lab and do some more work. I removed the old coaxial power connectors from the capacitor bank, re-drilled the connector feed through hole, along with 8 more bolt holes for securing the new connectors, bolted down the two new MHV 5kV connectors in place and wired everything back up, including the last 8 bleeder resistors and the capacitor bank end terminals. I ended up crimping the bleeders on to the end terminals so next time the gun is open I will do a more professional job and drill holes at the capacitor bank end bars so they can be bolted on, but for now THE GUN IS COMPLETE AND READY TO FIRE! As soon as the capacitor bank charging supply is built testing will resume.

With the gun ready and more powered tests imminent, it was time to start getting some muzzle velocity measurements. I set up a gun chronograph 6 feet away from the gun barrel with multiple cardboard sheets and wood as a backstop and fired several rounds through the chronograph. At 300PSI, the gun consistently fires a 1x1x.25″ (25x25x6mm) 6 gram aluminum slug at over 450feet per second (137m/s), with a top muzzle velocity of 482.5fps (147m/s, 529km/h, 329mph). This amounts to 64J kinetic energy, although on these tests the entire 2 feet length of the injector + rails is providing acceleration: on a powered test after 13 inches the electricity starts to provide more acceleration, and so the actual projectile injection velocity is a value significantly lower than the ones quoted here. The primary function of the injector is to simply get the projectile moving so that it does not weld in place inside the rail gun barrel, and as such any moderate velocity should suffice. However, even at 147m/s with the measured 63.4uS pulse length the projectile will move only 9mm under power if we assume no electrical acceleration. I find it unlikely that this gun is going to work with a metal armature until I design and implement a pulse lengthening inductor into the circuit, but before this happens I first plan on obtaining data for muzzle velocities with metal armatures and, more importantly, plasma armatures.
Click on the shooting setup picture below to view a Rail Gun muzzle velocity measurement video (the video is somewhat dark because the chronograph can not be used under fluorescent lighting).